“Effing” the military: a political misunderstanding of management

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

White, K. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8130-3526 (2017) “Effing” the military: a political misunderstanding of management. Defence Studies, 17 (4). pp. 346-358. ISSN 1743-9698 doi: 10.1080/14702436.2017.1351879

Abstract/Summary

The use of commercial business management techniques is widespread in all government departments, including the Ministry of Defence. This article examines the use of popular management techniques in the Armed Forces and argues that their application is misplaced. It looks at what the “effs” – “efficiency” and “effectiveness” – mean in the business world and to the Armed Forces. It compares the definitions both in business and the Armed Forces and finds that there are few, if any, situations where the same measurements can be applied. Whilst many management techniques are suited for business, the function of the Armed Forces and its output cannot be measured in the same way, complicated by the different metrics of “efficiency” in peace and in war. This difference may not be clearly understood by some politicians, or indeed by some senior military personnel. Using examples from some of the most popular management techniques such as “Lean” and “Agile” it is possible to see that their use might actually diminish the capabilities of the Armed Forces when it comes to performing their principal role – the use of force to achieve political objectives.

Altmetric Badge

Additional Information ** From Crossref via Jisc Publications Router.
Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/73320
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/14702436.2017.1351879
Refereed Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords Political Science and International Relations, History
Additional Information ** From Crossref via Jisc Publications Router.
Publisher Informa UK Limited
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar