Cicero, Paradoxa Stoicorum ad M. Brutum 38: an allusion to a new slave specialization?

[thumbnail of Permanent Publisher Embargo]
Text (Permanent Publisher Embargo) - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Marzano, A. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6485-9143 (2018) Cicero, Paradoxa Stoicorum ad M. Brutum 38: an allusion to a new slave specialization? Latomus: Revue d'études latines, 77 (1). pp. 161-176. ISSN 0023-8856 doi: 10.2143/LAT.77.1.3284727

Abstract/Summary

This article focuses on chapter 38 of the Paradoxa, in which Cicero attacks those prominent contemporaries of his who were too fond of their fishponds. Chapter 38 is part of the treatment of the fifth Stoic paradox, which states that only the wise man is free and all fools are slaves. The article argues that, when the rhetorical structure of the work and earlier comparisons made in the text are considered, it becomes clear that Cicero was alluding to the existence, in luxury maritime villas, of real slaves given the specific task of looking after the fishponds and their content. This reading of the text is further supported by what is currently known about Roman fish-farming practices on the basis of archaeological and comparative data. The clarification of this textual point contributes to our knowledge of the servile roles and specializations attested in very wealthy households.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/73262
Identification Number/DOI 10.2143/LAT.77.1.3284727
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Classics
Publisher Societe d'Etudes Latines de Bruxelles
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar