On winning forecasting competitions in economics

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Clements, M. P. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6329-1341 and Hendry, D. F. (1999) On winning forecasting competitions in economics. Spanish Economic Review, 1 (2). pp. 123-160. ISSN 1435-5477 doi: 10.1007/s101080050006

Abstract/Summary

To explain which methods might win forecasting competitions on economic time series, we consider forecasting in an evolving economy subject to structural breaks, using mis-specified, data-based models. ‘Causal’ models need not win when facing deterministic shifts, a primary factor underlying systematic forecast failure. We derive conditional forecast biases and unconditional (asymptotic) variances to show that when the forecast evaluation sample includes sub-periods following breaks, non-causal models will outperform at short horizons. This suggests using techniques which avoid systematic forecasting errors, including improved intercept corrections. An application to a small monetary model of the UK illustrates the theory.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/72772
Identification Number/DOI 10.1007/s101080050006
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Publisher Springer
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar