Evaluating the rationality of fixed-event forecasts

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Clements, M. P. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6329-1341 (1997) Evaluating the rationality of fixed-event forecasts. Journal of Forecasting, 16 (4). pp. 225-239. ISSN 1099-131X doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-131X(199707)16:4<225::AID-FOR656>3.0.CO;2-L

Abstract/Summary

A test of forecast rationality based on the weak efficiency of fixed-event forecasts was proposed by Nordhaus (1987). This paper considers the scope for pooling fixed-event forecasts across ‘events’, to deliver more powerful tests of the weak-efficiency hypothesis, when only a small number of fixed-event forecasts are available. In an empirical illustration we demonstrate the usefulness of this approach. We also suggest an interpretation of the rejection of the null hypothesis of weak efficiency in favour of negative autocorrelation in series of revisions to fixed-event forecasts. The relationship between weak efficiency and rationality when loss functions are asymmetric and prediction error variances are time-varying is also considered.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/72766
Identification Number/DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-131X(199707)16:4<225::AID-FOR656>3.0.CO;2-L
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Publisher Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar