Stuttering generalization self-measure: preliminary development of a self-measuring tool

Lists

Download

Preview

SGSM_Manuscript.pdf - Accepted Version (726kB) | Preview

Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives

Tools

Alameer, M., Meteyard, L. and Ward, D. (2017) Stuttering generalization self-measure: preliminary development of a self-measuring tool. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 53. pp. 41-51. ISSN 0094-730X doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2017.04.001

Abstract/Summary

Objectives: The reader will become knowledgeable about 1) the relationship between stuttering severity and speech-anxiety level, and 2) the importance of assessing the generalization effect in different social speaking situations. Additionally, the reader will understand the processes of validating the Stuttering Generalization Self-Measure. Abstract Introduction: Generalization of treatment is considered a difficult task for clinicians and people who stutter (PWS), and can constitute a barrier to long-term treatment success. To our knowledge, there are no standardized tests that collect measurement of the behavioral and cognitive aspects alongside the client’s self-perception in real-life speaking situations. Purpose: This paper describes the development of a Stuttering Generalization Self-Measure (SGSM). The purpose of SGSM is to assess 1) stuttering severity and 2) speech-anxiety level during real-life situations as perceived by PWS. Additionally, this measurement aims to 3) investigate correlations between stuttering severity and speech-anxiety level within the same real-life situation. Method: The SGSM includes speaking situations that are developed to cover a variety of frequent speaking situations. These items were created according to five listener categories (family and close friends, acquaintances, strangers, persons of authority, and giving a short speech to small audience). Forty-three participants (22 PWS, and 21 control) aged 18 to 53 years were asked to complete the assessment in real-life situations. Results: Preliminary analyses indicated that test-retest reliability was high for both groups. Discriminant validity was also achieved as the SGSM scores significantly differed between the two groups for stuttering and speech-anxiety. Convergent validity was confirmed by significant correlations between the SGSM and other speech-related anxiety measures.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type	Article
URI	https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/70184
Item Type	Article
Refereed	Yes
Divisions	Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Clinical Language Sciences Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Language and Cognition
Uncontrolled Keywords	Stuttering severity, speech-anxiety, self-perception, assessment, generalization
Publisher	Elsevier
Download/View statistics	View download statistics for this item

Download Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Deposit Details

Date Deposited:	09 May 2017 13:25	Date item deposited into CentAUR
Last Modified:	23 Jun 2024 02:17	Date item last modified

References

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (1995). Guidlines for practice in stuttering treatment. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 37(suppl. 14), 26-35. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. Bloodstein, O. (1995). A Handbook on Stuttering (5th ed.). San Diego, CA: Cingular Publishing Group, Inc. Blumgart, E., Tran, Y., &, Craig, A (2010). Social anxiety disorder in adults who stutter. Depression and Anxiety, 27, 687-692. Bothe, A. K., & Richardson, J. D. (2011). Statistical, practical, clinical, and personal significance in speech-language pathology. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 233-242. Bothe, A. K., Davidow, J. H., Bramlett, R. E., Franic, D. M., & Ingham, R. J. (2006). Stuttering treatment research, 1970–2005: II. Systematic review incorporating trial quality assessment of pharmacological approaches. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 342-352. Cullinan, W. L., & Prather, E. M. (1968). Reliability of “live” ratings of the speech of stutterers. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 27, 403-409. Curlee, R. F., (1993). Evaluating treatment efficacy for adults: Assessment of stuttering disability. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 18, 319-331 Craig, A., & Tran, Y. (2006). Fear of Speaking: Chronic anxiety and stuttering. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 12, 6. Cream, A., O’Brian, S., Jones, M., Block, S., Harrison, E., Lincoln, M., et al. (2010). Randomized controlled trial of video self-modeling following speech restructuring treatment of stuttering. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 887-897. Eve, C., Onslow, M., Andrews, C., & Adams, R. (1995). Clinical measurement of early stuttering severity: The reliability of a 10-point scale. Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders, 23, 26-39. Finn, P. (1997). Adults recovered from stuttering without formal treatment: Perceptual assessment of speech normalcy. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 821-831. Finn, P. (2003). Addressing generalization and maintenance of stuttering treatment in schools: A critical look. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 153-164. Finn, P., Howard, R., & Kubala, R. (2005). Unassisted recovery from stuttering: Self-perceptions of current speech behavior, attitudes, and feelings. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 30, 281-305. Guitar, B. (2014). Stuttering: An integrated approach to its nature and treatment (4rd Ed.). Baltimore, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Harasym, J., Langevin, M., & Kully, D. (2015). Video self-modeling as a post-treatment fluency recovery strategy for adults. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 44, 32-45. Hillis, J. (1993). On-going assessment in the management of stuttering: A critical perspective. Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 2(1), 24-37. Ingham, J. C., & Riley, G. (1998). Guidelines for documentation of treatment efficacy for young children who stutter. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 753-770. Ingham, R., Ingham, J. C., Bothe, A. K. (2012). Integrating functional measures with treatment: A tactic enhancing personality significant change in the treatment of adults and adolescents who stutter. American Journal of Speech-Language, Pathology, 21, 264-277. Ingham, R. J., & Cordes, A. K. (1999). On watching a discipline shoot itself in the foot: Some observation on current trends in stuttering treatment. In N. B. Ratner & E. C. Healey (Eds.), Stuttering research and practice: Bridging the gap (pp. 211-230). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Ingham, R. J., & Costello, J. M. (1984). Stuttering treatment outcome evaluation. In J. M. Castello (Ed.), Speech disorders in children: Recent advances (pp. 313-346). San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press. Ingham, R. J., & Costello, J. M. (1985). Stuttering treatment outcome evaluation. In J. M. Castello (Ed.), Speech disorders in children: Recent advances (pp. 189-223). San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press. Iverach, L., Menzies, R. G., O'Brian, S., Packman, A., Onslow, M. (2011). Anxiety and stuttering: Continuing to explore a complex relationship. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 231-232. James (1981). Behavioral self-control of stuttering using time-out from speaking. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 14, 25-37 Jones, M., Gebski, V., Onslow, M., and Packman, A. (2002). Statistical power in stuttering research: A tutorial. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 45, 243-255. Jones, M., Onslow, M., Packman, A., Williams, S., Ormond, T., Schwartz, I., et al. (2005). Randomised controlled trial of Lidcombe Programme of early stuttering intervention [Electronic version]. British Medical Journal, 331(7518), 659. Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Klein, J. F., & Hood, S. B. (2004). The impact of stuttering on employment opportunities and job performance. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 29, 255-273. Logan, K. (2003). The effect of syntactic structure upon speech initiation times of stuttering and nonstuttering speakers. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 28, 17-35. Manning, W. H. (2001). Clinical decision making in fluency disorders (2nd Ed.). Calgary, Canada: Singular Thomson Learning. Martin, R., & Haroldson, S. (1992). Stuttering and speech naturalness: Audio and audiovisual judgments. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 35, 521-528. McClean, M. D., & Runyan, C. M. (2000). Variations in the relative speeds of orofacial structures with stuttering severity. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 43(6), 1524-1531. McCroskey, J. C. (1982). An introduction to rhetorical communication (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-hall. McCroskey, J. C., and McCroskey, L. L. (1988). Self-report as an approach to measuring communication competence. Communication Research Reports, 5, 108-113. McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P. (1987). Willingness to communicate. In J. C. McCroskey & J. A. Daly (Eds). Personality and interpersonal communication, 119, 131. Menzies, R. G., Onslow, M., & Packman, A. (1999). Anxiety and stuttering: Exploring a complex relationship. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 3-10. Onslow, M., Andrews, C., & Costa, L. (1990). Parental severity scaling of early stuttered speech: Four case studies. Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders, 18, 47-61. Onslow, M., Costa, L., & Rue, S. (1990). Direct early intervention with stuttering: Some preliminary data. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 405-416 Peters, H. F., M., Hietkamp, R. K., & Boves, L. (1993). Aerodynamic and phonatory processes in dysfluent speech utterances of stutterers. American Speech & Hearing Association, 35, 144. Riley, G. (1994). Stuttering severity instrument for children and adults. Austin, TX: Pro-ed. Riley, G. (2009). Stuttering Severity Instrument for Children and Adults- (4th Ed.). Austin, Texas: Pro-ed. St. Clare, T., Menzies, R. G., Onslow, M., Packman, A., Thompson, R., and Block, S. (2009). Unhelpful thoughts and beliefs linked to social anxiety in stuttering: Development of a measure. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44 (3), 338-351. St Louis, K. (2006). Measurement issues in fluency disorders. In N. B. Ratner & J. Tetnowski (Eds.), Current issues in stuttering research and practice (pp. 61-86). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Susca, M, & Healey, E. (2002). Listener perception along a fluency - disfluency continuum: A phenomenological analysis. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 27, 135-161. Van-Dam Baggen, R., and Kraaimaat, F. (1999). Assessing Social Anxiety: The Inventory of Interpersonal Situations (IIS). European Journal of Psychology Assessment, 15(1), 25-38. Van Riper, C. (1982). The nature of stuttering (2nd Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, Nj: Prentice Hall. Viswanath, N. S., & Rosenfield, D. B. (2000). Preponderance of lead voice onset time in stutterers under varying constraints. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 22, 49-55. Wingate, M. (2002). The nature of stuttering (2nd Ed.). San Diego, Ca: Academic Press. Yairi, E., & Embrose, N. (2013). Epidemiology of stuttering: 21st Century advances. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 38, 66-87 Yaruss, S. (2001). Evaluation treatment outcomes for adults who stutter. Journal of Communication Disorders, 34, 90-115.

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar