Can genetic-based advice help you lose weight? Findings from the Food4Me European randomized controlled trial

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Celis-Morales, C., Marsaux, C. F. M., Livingstone, K. M., Navas-Carretero, S., San-Cristobal, R., Fallaize, R., Macready, A. L. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0368-9336, O'Donovan, C., Woolhead, C., Forster, H., Kolossa, S., Daniel, H., Moschonis, G., Mavrogianni, C., Manios, Y., Surwillo, A., Traczyk, I., Drevon, C. A., Grimaldi, K., Bouwman, J., Gibney, M. J., Walsh, M. C., Gibney, E. R., Brennan, L., Lovegrove, J. A. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7633-9455, Martinez, J. A., Saris, W. H. M. and Mathers, J. C. (2017) Can genetic-based advice help you lose weight? Findings from the Food4Me European randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 105 (5). pp. 1204-1213. ISSN 1938-3207 doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.145680

Abstract/Summary

Background: There has been limited evidence about whether genotype-tailored advice provides extra benefits in reducing obesity-related traits compared with the benefits of conventional one-size-fits-all advice.Objective: We determined whether the disclosure of information on fat-mass and obesity-associated (FTO) genotype risk had a greater effect on a reduction of obesity-related traits in risk carriers than in nonrisk carriers across different levels of personalized nutrition.Design: A total of 683 participants (women: 51%; age range: 18-73 y) from the Food4Me randomized controlled trial were included in this analysis. Participants were randomly assigned to 4 intervention arms as follows: level 0, control group; level 1, dietary group; level 2, phenotype group; and level 3, genetic group. FTO (single nucleotide polymorphism rs9939609) was genotyped at baseline in all participants, but only subjects who were randomly assigned to level 3 were informed about their genotypes. Level 3 participants were stratified into risk carriers (AA/AT) and nonrisk carriers (TT) of the FTO gene for analyses. Height, weight, and waist circumference (WC) were self-measured and reported at baseline and months 3 and 6.Results: Changes in adiposity markers were greater in participants who were informed that they carried the FTO risk allele (level 3 AT/AA carriers) than in the nonpersonalized group (level 0) but not in the other personalized groups (level 1 and 2). Mean reductions in weight and WC at month 6 were greater for FTO risk carriers than for noncarriers in the level 3 group [-2.28 kg (95% CI: -3.06, -1.48 kg) compared with -1.99 kg (-2.19, -0.19 kg), respectively (P = 0.037); and -4.34 cm (-5.63, -3.08 cm) compared with -1.99 cm (-4.04, -0.05 cm), respectively, (P = 0.048)].Conclusions: There are greater body weight and WC reductions in risk carriers than in nonrisk carriers of the FTO gene.

Altmetric Badge

Additional Information ** From PubMed via Jisc Publications Router. ** History: ** received: 16-09-2016 ** accepted: 03-03-2017
Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/70064
Identification Number/DOI 10.3945/ajcn.116.145680
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Chemistry, Food and Pharmacy > Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences > Human Nutrition Research Group
Uncontrolled Keywords FTO, genotype, personalized nutrition, randomized controlled trial, weight
Additional Information ** From PubMed via Jisc Publications Router. ** History: ** received: 16-09-2016 ** accepted: 03-03-2017
Publisher American Society for Nutrition
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar