Trust in Chinese–English bilingual documents: a heuristic for typographic decision-making

[thumbnail of Open access]
Preview
Text (Open access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
[thumbnail of Typoday_2017_paper_Tam_lite.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Tam, K. (2017) Trust in Chinese–English bilingual documents: a heuristic for typographic decision-making. In: Typography Day Colombo 2017, 24–25 Feb 2017, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Abstract/Summary

This paper explores the notion of trust in bilingual documents. A heuristic is presented, examining various levels of decision-making carried out by the producer and designer of a bilingual document that will influence the perception of trust on the reader’s part. The seven interrelated considerations are (1) producer (2) script (3) reader (4) context (5) genre (6) content (7) production. Although some of these decisions are purely strategic and invisible to the reader, this paper argues that they can always be inferred in a bilingual document’s graphic presentation. Decisions on graphic presentation work across all seven levels of consideration, establishing the status relationship between two languages as well as providing cues for readers to access a document’s rhetorical structure in myriad ways. Examples of Chinese–English bilingual documents from Hong Kong are used to illustrate the discussions. The heuristic aims to promote further discussions and research on bilingual document design issues as well as to guide practice.

Item Type Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/69732
Refereed No
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Arts and Communication Design > Typography & Graphic Communication
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar