Impact of pre-Columbian 'geoglyph' builders on Amazonian forests

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
[thumbnail of 69096 Watling et al. 2017 PNAS FINAL.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Watling, J., Iriarte, J., Mayle, F. E. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9208-0519, Schaan, D., Pessenda, L. C.R., Loader, N. J., Street-Perrott, F. A., Dickau, R. E., Damasceno, A. and Ranzi, A. (2017) Impact of pre-Columbian 'geoglyph' builders on Amazonian forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114 (8). pp. 1868-1873. ISSN 0027-8424 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1614359114

Abstract/Summary

Over 450 pre-Columbian (pre-AD1492) geometric ditched enclosures ('geoglyphs') occupy ca. 13,000 km2 of Acre state, Brazil, representing a key discovery of Amazonian archaeology. These huge earthworks were concealed for centuries under terra firme (upland interfluvial) rainforest, directly challenging the 'pristine' status of this ecosystem and its perceived vulnerability to human impacts. We reconstruct the environmental context of geoglyph construction and the nature, extent and legacy of associated human impacts. We show that bamboo forest dominated the region for ≥6000 y and that only small, temporary clearings were made to build the geoglyphs; however, construction occurred within anthropogenic forest that had been actively managed for millennia. In the absence of widespread deforestation, exploitation of forest products shaped a largely forested landscape that survived intact until the late 20th century.

Altmetric Badge

Additional Information See also: Reply to Piperno et al.: It is too soon to argue for localized, short-term human impacts in interfluvial Amazonia http://www.pnas.org/content/114/21/E4120.full
Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/69096
Identification Number/DOI 10.1073/pnas.1614359114
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science > Department of Geography and Environmental Science
Additional Information See also: Reply to Piperno et al.: It is too soon to argue for localized, short-term human impacts in interfluvial Amazonia http://www.pnas.org/content/114/21/E4120.full
Publisher National Academy of Sciences
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar