Virginia Woolf’s shadow: sex bias in academic publication

[thumbnail of Macdonald on publishing data copy CENTAUR.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Macdonald, K. (2016) Virginia Woolf’s shadow: sex bias in academic publication. In: Rayner, S. and Lyons, R. (eds.) The Academic Book of the Future. University College London Press, London, UK. (Unpublished)

Abstract/Summary

The principal findings of this chapter on gender patterns of authorship and subject in scholarly publications on British authors in the period 1930-60, are that, within these parameters, women authors publish on female subjects much more than male authors do, and male authors rarely publish on women subjects, unless they are Virginia Woolf. An unanticipated result from the data shows that, as a subject, Woolf dominates the British academic monograph market for this period. She throws a historiographical shadow like no other twentieth-century woman author, which exacerbates a serious imbalance in the publication of scholarship on other women writers of this period.

Item Type Book or Report Section
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/69006
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Literature and Languages > English Literature
Publisher University College London Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar