Does access to capital affect cost stickiness? Evidence from China

[thumbnail of 20160908DoesAccesstoCapitalAffectCostStickiness_UOR.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Cheng, S., Jiang, W. and Zeng, Y. (2018) Does access to capital affect cost stickiness? Evidence from China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 25 (1-2). pp. 177-198. ISSN 2164-2257 doi: 10.1080/16081625.2016.1253483

Abstract/Summary

We study the effect of limited access to capital on firm cost stickiness, using data from a large sample of Chinese private firms over 1998-2007. Our results show that on average SG&A costs are anti-sticky. For firms in regions with lower levels of financial development, SG&A costs have lower sensitivity to sales increases and exhibit lower stickiness. Overall our findings suggest access to capital as an important determinant of cost stickiness.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/67567
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/16081625.2016.1253483
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar