Considering evidence: the approach taken by the Hazardous Substances Advisory Committee in the UK

[thumbnail of HSAC Quality of Evidence paper clean.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Collins, C. D., Baddeley, M., Clare, G., Murphy, R., Owens, S. and Rocks, S. (2016) Considering evidence: the approach taken by the Hazardous Substances Advisory Committee in the UK. Environment International, 92-93. pp. 565-568. ISSN 0160-4120 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.01.006

Abstract/Summary

The Hazardous Substances Advisory Committee (HSAC) provides expert advice to UK officials, Ministers and other relevant bodies on the protection of the environment, and human health via the environment, from potentially hazardous substances and articles. Hazardous substances are often the subject of controversy, on which individuals, and different groups in society, hold divergent views. This paper details the approach taken by HSAC when considering the evidence to provide advice on hazardous substances. Firstly HSAC reviews the range of evidence and determines its quality considering: transparency of aims, the methodology and results, completeness, independent review and accessibility. HSAC does not follow one explicit methodology as the wide range of hazardous substances we consider means they need to be addressed on a case by case basis. Most notably HSAC considers the evidence in the wider context, being aware of factors that influence individuals in their decision making when receiving a HSAC opinion e.g. trust in the source of the evidence, defensibility, conformity to a ‘world view’ and framing. HSACs also reflects on its own perspectives with the aim of addressing bias by the diversity of its membership. The Committee’s intention, in adopting this rounded approach, is to reach opinions that are robust, relevant and defensible.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/67477
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2016.01.006
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science > Earth Systems Science
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar