Working group 3: What are and how do we measure the pros and cons of existing approaches?

Reynolds, C., Leutbecher, M., Batte, L., Chen, S., Christensen, H., Klasa, C., Pegion, P., Plant, B. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8808-0022, Raynaud, L., Roberts, N., Sandu, I., Singleton, A., Sommer, M., Swinbank, R., Tennant, W. and Theis, S. (2016) Working group 3: What are and how do we measure the pros and cons of existing approaches? In: ECMWF/WWRP Workshop: Model Uncertainty, 11-15 April 2016, ECMWF, Reading, pp. 13-16.

Abstract/Summary

WG3 discussed both the pros and cons of existing schemes as well as metrics to measure relative advantages and disadvantages. We first provide a list of the current operational techniques and their respective advantages and disadvantages that were discussed in the WG. We do not claim that the list is complete, and we note that the pros and cons are neither exhaustive nor quantitative. Nevertheless, it may be useful to note the WG’s consensus on the general advantages and disadvantages of the most commonly-used schemes. We then list our recommendations for evaluating model uncertainty schemes. At the end is a short list pertaining to recommendations for further development of methods to represent model uncertainty.

Item Type	Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
URI	https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/66610
Refereed	Yes
Divisions	Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology
Download/View statistics	View download statistics for this item