Resilience in crisis reconsidered: the need for values against relativist ethics

Georgantzis, N. (2016) Resilience in crisis reconsidered: the need for values against relativist ethics. CIEHAM Watch Letter, 36.

Abstract/Summary

The need for a reconsideration of resilience from both a positive and a normative point of view can be discussed using some of the lessons and conclusions drawn from individual resilience studied by psychologists in an educational context. The main point made in this article is that unless we want to approach resilience as a feature which is exogenously given in each population and society and whose dynamics, if any, are not subject to deliberate actions and policies, we need a framework for the evaluation of resilience as a social good. Relying on the hope that resilience is necessarily built in our societies as a force guaranteeing convergence to a socially desirable point of social evolution may be too optimistic and even counterproductive, because it may lead us to an inefficient or biased political and regulatory decision making. When the effect of policies and actions at a national or international level take into account the dynamic effect of such actions on resilience itself, one cannot blindly rely on the goodness of the process any more. This is mainly because resilience is not uniformly embodied in all societies and it does not have a globally positive social value by itself. The issue of socially valuing the options available beyond market-price valuations becomes fundamental in this context.

Item Type	Article
URI	https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/65594
Refereed	No
Divisions	Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Agri-Food Economics & Marketing
Publisher	International Centre for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies (CIHEAM)
Download/View statistics	View download statistics for this item