Recategorization and subgroup identification: predicting and preventing threats from common ingroups

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Crisp, R. J., Stone, C. H. and Hall, N. R. (2006) Recategorization and subgroup identification: predicting and preventing threats from common ingroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32 (2). pp. 230-243. ISSN 0146-1672 doi: 10.1177/0146167205280908

Abstract/Summary

Much work has supported the idea that recategorization of ingroups and outgroups into a superordinate category can have beneficial effects for intergroup relations. Recently, however, increases in bias following recategorization have been observed in some contexts. It is argued that such unwanted consequences of recategorization will only be apparent for perceivers who are highly committed to their ingroup subgroups. In Experiments 1 to 3, the authors observed, on both explicit and implicit measures, that an increase in bias following recategorization occurred only for high subgroup identifiers. In Experiment 4, it was found that maintaining the salience of subgroups within a recategorized superordinate group averted this increase in bias for high identifiers and led overall to the lowest levels of bias. These findings are discussed in the context of recent work on the Common Ingroup Identity Model.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/5850
Identification Number/DOI 10.1177/0146167205280908
Refereed Yes
Divisions No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Publisher SAGE Publications
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar