Investigating typographic differentiation: italics are more subtle than bold for emphasis

[thumbnail of 11_revision_MD_final.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Registered users only
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
Restricted to Registered users only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Dyson, M. C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0920-4312 and Beier, S. (2016) Investigating typographic differentiation: italics are more subtle than bold for emphasis. Information Design Journal, 22 (1). pp. 3-18. ISSN 0142-5471 doi: 10.175/idj.22.1.02dys

Abstract/Summary

Text designers are likely to benefit from guidance on how to use typographic differentiation for emphasis. Three experiments use purposely-designed fonts to explore the size and nature of differences in the stylistic characteristics of fonts (weight, width, contrast, italic) which affect letter identification. Results indicate that words set in bold and expanded fonts, when alternated with words set in a Neutral test font, may impair performance, whereas changing to italic does not. Possible explanations are explored through measuring the physical and perceptual similarities of the test fonts.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/57479
Identification Number/DOI 10.175/idj.22.1.02dys
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Arts and Communication Design > Typography & Graphic Communication
Publisher John Benjamins
Publisher Statement This material is under copyright and the publisher should be contacted for permission to re-use or reprint the material in any form
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar