'The debatable territory where geology and archaeology meet': reassessing the early archaeobotanical work of Clement Reid and Arthur Lyell at Roman Silchester

[thumbnail of Lodwick_2016.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
[thumbnail of Supplementary Table ESM Table 1]
Other (Supplementary Table ESM Table 1) - Supplemental Material
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Lodwick, L. A. (2017) 'The debatable territory where geology and archaeology meet': reassessing the early archaeobotanical work of Clement Reid and Arthur Lyell at Roman Silchester. Environmental Archaeology: the Journal of Human Palaeoecology, 22 (1). pp. 56-78. ISSN 1461-4103 doi: 10.1080/14614103.2015.1116218

Abstract/Summary

The first large-scale archaeobotanical study in Britain, conducted from 1899 to 1909 by Clement Reid and Arthur Lyell at Silchester, provided the first evidence for the introduction of Roman plant foods to Britain, yet the findings have thus far remained unverified. This paper presents a reassessment of these archaeobotanical remains, now stored as part of the Silchester Collection in Reading Museum. The documentary evidence for the Silchester study is summarised, before the results are presented for over a 1000 plant remains including an assessment of preservation, identification and modern contamination. The dataset includes both evidence for the presence of nationally rare plant foods, such as medlar, and several archaeophytes. The methodologies and original interpretations of Reid and Lyell’s study are reassessed in light of current archaeobotanical knowledge. Spatial and contextual patterns in the distribution of plant foods and ornamental taxa are also explored. Finally, the legacy of the study for the development of archaeobotany in the 20th century is evaluated.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/54531
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/14614103.2015.1116218
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science > Department of Archaeology
Publisher Maney Publishing
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar