Construction contract policy: do we mean what we say?

[thumbnail of RICS_4-12_-_Hughes_and_Maeda.pdf]
Preview
Text - Published Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Hughes, W. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0304-8136 and Maeda, Y. (2002) Construction contract policy: do we mean what we say? RICS Research Papers, 4 (12). pp. 1-25.

Abstract/Summary

Recent developments in contracting practice in the UK have built upon recommendations contained in highprofile reports, such as those by Latham and Egan. However, the New Engineering Contract (NEC), endorsed by Latham, is based upon principles of contract drafting that seem open to question. Any contract operates in the context of its legislative environment and current working practices. This report identifies eight contentious hypotheses in the literature on construction contracts and tests their validity in a sample survey that attracted 190 responses. The survey shows, among other things, that while partnership is a positive and useful idea, authoritative contract management is considered more effective and that “win-win” contracts, while desirable, are basically impractical. Further, precision and fairness in contracts are not easy to achieve simultaneously. While participants should know what is in their contracts, they should not routinely resort to legal action; and standard-form contracts should not seek to be universally applicable. Fundamental changes to drafting policy should be undertaken within the context of current legal contract doctrine and with a sensitivity to the way that contracts are used in contemporary practice. Attitudes to construction contracting may seem to be changing on the surface, but detailed analysis of what lies behind apparent agreement on new ways of working reveals that attitudes are changing much more slowly than they appear to be.

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/4311
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of the Built Environment > Organisation, People and Technology group
Uncontrolled Keywords contract; procurement; drafting
Publisher RICS Foundation
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar