Student perceptions of iPads as mobile learning devices for fieldwork

[thumbnail of Manuscript - final re-submission (1).pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Welsh, K. E., Mauchline, A. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1168-8552, Powell, V., France, D., Park, J. R. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3430-9052 and Whalley, W. B. (2015) Student perceptions of iPads as mobile learning devices for fieldwork. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39 (3). pp. 450-469. ISSN 1466-1845 doi: 10.1080/03098265.2015.1066315

Abstract/Summary

This paper reports findings from six field courses about student’s perceptions of iPads as mobile learning devices for fieldwork. Data were collected through surveys and focus groups. The key findings suggest that the multi-tool nature of the iPads and their portability were the main strengths. Students had some concerns over the safety of the iPads in adverse weather and rugged environments, though most of these concerns were eliminated after using the devices with protective cases. Reduced connectivity was found to be one of the main challenges for mobile learning. Finally, students and practitioners views of why they used the mobile devices for fieldwork did not align.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/42828
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/03098265.2015.1066315
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Sustainable Land Management > Centre for Agri-environmental Research (CAER)
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar