Community projects: an experimental analysis of a fair implementation process

[thumbnail of Cicognanietal2015 Community Projects SCW.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Cicognani, S., D'Ambrosio, A., Güth, W., Pfuderer, S. and Ploner, M. (2015) Community projects: an experimental analysis of a fair implementation process. Social Choice and Welfare, 44 (1). pp. 109-132. ISSN 1432-217X doi: 10.1007/s00355-014-0822-y

Abstract/Summary

We define and experimentally test a public provision mechanism that meets three basic ethical requirements and allows community members to influence, via monetary bids, which of several projects is implemented. For each project, participants are assigned personal values, which can be positive or negative. We provide either public or private information about personal values. This produces two distinct public provision games, which are experimentally implemented and analyzed for various projects. In spite of the complex experimental task, participants do not rely on bidding their own personal values as an obvious simple heuristic whose general acceptance would result in fair and efficient outcomes. Rather, they rely on strategic underbidding. Although underbidding is affected by projects’ characteristics, the provision mechanism mostly leads to the implementation of the most efficient project.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/41036
Identification Number/DOI 10.1007/s00355-014-0822-y
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Agri-Food Economics & Marketing
Uncontrolled Keywords C91; C72; D63
Publisher Springer
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar