'he perceives himself as a caterpillar […]' constructions of the disabled subject in the critical response to Alfred Hitchcock's 'Rear Window'

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Cocks, N. (2015) 'he perceives himself as a caterpillar […]' constructions of the disabled subject in the critical response to Alfred Hitchcock's 'Rear Window'. In: Lesnik-Oberstein, K. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4970-0556 (ed.) Rethinking Disability Theory and Practice: Challenging Essentialism. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 165-184. ISBN 9781137456977

Abstract/Summary

This chapter focuses on critical responses to Alfred Hitchcock’s Rear Window, especially their construction of disability. The suggestion is that such criticism takes the disabled body to be both necessary and superfluous to the meaning of the film, a difficulty that, I argue, can be read more widely within film theory. Ever since Christian Metz’s ‘the Imaginary Signifier’, the condition of being ‘bound to a wheelchair’ is understood to have a resonance for theories of film spectatorship, but only ever in a sense that does away with the wheelchair as a mark of difference.

Item Type Book or Report Section
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/40671
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > Language Text and Power
Arts, Humanities and Social Science > Identities
Publisher Palgrave Macmillan
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar