The case of pre-natal diagnosis

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Lesnik-Oberstein, K. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4970-0556 (2015) The case of pre-natal diagnosis. In: Lesnik-Oberstein, K. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4970-0556 (ed.) Rethinking Disability Theory and Practice: Challenging Essentialism. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, pp. 6-19. ISBN 9781137456960

Abstract/Summary

This chapter reconsiders critiques of pre-natal diagnosis in Disability Studies. Underlying assumptions about reproductive technologies are analysed to demonstrate that while many critiques of pre-natal diagnosis by Disability activists and theorists are concerned about children being the product of 'choice' through the selective effects of pre-natal diagnosis, the issue that reproductive technologies (such as IVF) themselves necessarily always already rely on 'choice' -- namely the choice for a 'biological' or 'own' child (different terms are used) -- is nowhere considered. The chapter considers several consequences of thinking through this issue and its implications.

Item Type Book or Report Section
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/40534
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Literature and Languages > English Literature
Publisher Palgrave Macmillan
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar