Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Physiological and behavioral patterns of corruption

[thumbnail of Publishers format]
120902_Georgantzis_Manuscript (2).pdf - Accepted Version (3MB)
Restricted to Repository staff only
[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
fnbeh-08-00434.pdf - Published Version (2MB) | Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Jaber-López, T., García Gallego, A., Perakakis, P. and Georgantzis, N. (2014) Physiological and behavioral patterns of corruption. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8. 434. ISSN 1662-5153 doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00434

Abstract/Summary

We study the behavior and emotional arousal of the participants in an experimental auction, leading to an asymmetric social dilemma involving an auctioneer and two bidders. An antisocial transfer (bribe) which is beneficial for the auctioneer (official) is paid, if promised, by the winner of the auction. Some pro-social behavior on both the auctioneers' and the bidders' sides is observed even in the absence of any punishment mechanism (Baseline, Treatment 0). However, pro-social behavior is adopted by the vast majority of subjects when the loser of the auction can inspect the transaction between the winner and the auctioneer (Inspection, Treatment 1). The inspection and punishment mechanism is such that, if a bribe is (not) revealed, both corrupt agents (the denouncing bidder) lose(s) this period's payoffs. This renders the inspection option unprofitable for the loser and is rarely used, especially towards the end of the session, when pro-social behavior becomes pervasive. Subjects' emotional arousal was obtained through skin conductance responses. Generally speaking, our findings suggest that stronger emotions are associated with decisions deviating from pure monetary reward maximization, rather than with (un)ethical behavior per se. In fact, using response times as a measure of the subject's reflection during the decision-making process, we can associate emotional arousal with the conflict between primary or instinctive and secondary or contemplative motivations and, more specifically, with deviations from the subject's pure monetary interest.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/38495
Identification Number/DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00434
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Agri-Food Economics & Marketing
Uncontrolled Keywords Corruption, Skin conductance response, Response Time, Emotions, Ethics
Publisher Frontiers
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar