Reinterpreting 'generic structure': evolution, application and limitations of a concept

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Lane, D. C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6658-7041 and Smart, C. (1996) Reinterpreting 'generic structure': evolution, application and limitations of a concept. System Dynamics Review, 12 (2). pp. 87-120. ISSN 0883-7066

Abstract/Summary

This paper traces the evolution of the generic structure concept in system dynamics and discusses the different practical uses to which they have been put. A review of previous work leads to the identification of three different views of what a generic structure is and, hence, what transferability means. These different views are distinguishable in application as well as in theory. Examination of these interpretations shows that the assumptions behind them are quite distinct. From this analysis it is argued that it is no longer useful to treat generic structure as a single concept since the unity it implies is only superficial. The conclusion is that the concept needs unbundling so that different assumptions about transferability of structure can be made explicit, and the role of generic structures as generalisable theories of dynamic behaviour in system dynamics theory and practice can be debated and clarified more effectively.

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/38172
Refereed Yes
Divisions No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Henley Business School > Digitalisation, Marketing and Entrepreneurship
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar