The cross-currency hedging performance of implied versus statistical forecasting models

[thumbnail of 35960.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Brooks, C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2668-1153 and Chong, J. (2001) The cross-currency hedging performance of implied versus statistical forecasting models. Journal of Futures Markets, 21 (11). pp. 1043-1069. ISSN 1096-9934 doi: 10.1002/fut.2104

Abstract/Summary

This article examines the ability of several models to generate optimal hedge ratios. Statistical models employed include univariate and multivariate generalized autoregressive conditionally heteroscedastic (GARCH) models, and exponentially weighted and simple moving averages. The variances of the hedged portfolios derived using these hedge ratios are compared with those based on market expectations implied by the prices of traded options. One-month and three-month hedging horizons are considered for four currency pairs. Overall, it has been found that an exponentially weighted moving-average model leads to lower portfolio variances than any of the GARCH-based, implied or time-invariant approaches.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/35960
Identification Number/DOI 10.1002/fut.2104
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Publisher Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar