Grupp, A., Bubrin, M., Ehret, F., Zeng, Q., Hartl, F. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7013-5360, Kvapilová, H., Zálisˇ, S. and Kaim, W.
(2013)
RuII(α-diimine) or RuIII(α-diimine·–)? Structural,
spectroscopic, and theoretical evidence for the
stabilization of a prominent metal-to-Ligand charge-
transfer excited-state configuration in the ground state.
European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2014 (1).
pp. 110-119.
ISSN 1434-1948
doi: 10.1002/ejic.201301206
Abstract/Summary
The new compounds [Ru(R-DAB)(acac)2] (R-DAB = 1,4-diorganyl- 1,4-diazabuta-1,3-diene; R = tert-butyl, 4-methoxyphenyl, 2,6-dimethylphenyl; acac– = 2,4-pentanedionate) exhibit intrachelate ring bond lengths 1.297<d(CN)<1.344 Å and 1.382<d(CC)<1.425 Å, which suggest a RuIII(R-DAB·–) oxidation state formulation. This notion is confirmed by the negligible solvatochromism of the intense (ε ≈ 104 M–1cm–1) charge-transfer absorption band in the visible region and by DFT calculations. Oxidation of the compounds occurs mainly at the R-DAB·– radical ligand to produce UV/Vis/NIR and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroelectrochemically detectable RuIII species, whereas the reduction proceeds less reversibly and yields predominantly (R-DAB)-ligand-based spin for the 4-methoxyphenyl derivative, measured at low temperature. The results are discussed with respect to metal-to-ligand chargetransfer (MLCT) excited states of conventional (α-diimine)- ruthenium(II) complexes and in view of other (α-diimine)- metal complexes with ambiguous oxidation-state assignments.
Altmetric Badge
Item Type | Article |
URI | https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/35678 |
Item Type | Article |
Refereed | Yes |
Divisions | Interdisciplinary centres and themes > Chemical Analysis Facility (CAF) Life Sciences > School of Chemistry, Food and Pharmacy > Department of Chemistry |
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell |
Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record