On SETAR non-linearity and forecasting

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Clements, M. P. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6329-1341, Franses, P. H., Smith, J. and van Dijk, D. (2003) On SETAR non-linearity and forecasting. Journal of Forecasting, 22 (5). pp. 359-375. ISSN 1099-131X doi: 10.1002/for.863

Abstract/Summary

We compare linear autoregressive (AR) models and self-exciting threshold autoregressive (SETAR) models in terms of their point forecast performance, and their ability to characterize the uncertainty surrounding those forecasts, i.e. interval or density forecasts. A two-regime SETAR process is used as the data-generating process in an extensive set of Monte Carlo simulations, and we consider the discriminatory power of recently developed methods of forecast evaluation for different degrees of non-linearity. We find that the interval and density evaluation methods are unlikely to show the linear model to be deficient on samples of the size typical for macroeconomic data

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/35231
Identification Number/DOI 10.1002/for.863
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Publisher Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar