Literal and extended use of kinship terms in documentary papryi

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Dickey, E. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4272-4803 (2004) Literal and extended use of kinship terms in documentary papryi. Mnemosyne, 57 (2). pp. 131-176. ISSN 0026-7074 doi: 10.1163/156852504773399169

Abstract/Summary

Kinship terms in papyrus letters do not always refer to actual relatives and so pose many problems for modern readers. But by examining all the kinship terms in six centuries of letters it is possible to discover some rules governing the use of kinship terms: in some situations they appear to be always literal, and in others they appear to be almost always extended, though a third group of contexts remains ambiguous. The rules are complex and depend on the particular kinship term involved, the date of writing, the use of names, the position of the kinship term in the letter, and the person to whom it connects the referent.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/35034
Identification Number/DOI 10.1163/156852504773399169
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Classics
Publisher Brill
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar