A sequential procedure for comparing two experimental treatments with a control

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Vincent, E., Todd, S. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9981-923X and Whitehead, J. (2002) A sequential procedure for comparing two experimental treatments with a control. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 12 (2). pp. 249-265. ISSN 1054-3406 doi: 10.1081/BIP-120015747

Abstract/Summary

A procedure is described in which patients are randomized between two experimental treatments and a control. At a series of interim analyses, each experimental treatment is compared with control. One of the experimental treatments might then be found sufficiently superior to the control for it to be declared the best treatment, and the trial stopped. Alternatively, experimental treatments might be eliminated from further consideration at any stage. It is shown how the procedure can be conducted while controlling overall error probabilities. Data concerning evaluation of different doses of riluzole in the treatment of motor neurone disease are used for illustration.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/33515
Identification Number/DOI 10.1081/BIP-120015747
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Mathematics and Statistics
Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Mathematics and Statistics > Applied Statistics
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar