In-situ comparison of the NOy instruments flown in MOZAIC and SPURT

[thumbnail of In-situ_comparison_of_the_NO_instruments_flown_in_MOZAIC_and_SPURT[2006].pdf]
Preview
Text - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Pätz, H.-W., Volz-Thomas, A., Hegglin, M. I. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2820-9044, Brunner, D., Fischer, H. and Schmidt, U. (2006) In-situ comparison of the NOy instruments flown in MOZAIC and SPURT. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 6. pp. 2401-2410. ISSN 1680-7316 doi: 10.5194/acp-6-2401-2006

Abstract/Summary

Two aircraft instruments for the measurement of total odd nitrogen (NOy) were compared side by side aboard a Learjet A35 in April 2003 during a campaign of the AFO2000 project SPURT (Spurengastransport in der Tropopausenregion). The instruments albeit employing the same measurement principle (gold converter and chemiluminescence) had different inlet configurations. The ECO-Physics instrument operated by ETH-Zürich in SPURT had the gold converter mounted outside the aircraft, whereas the instrument operated by FZ-Jülich in the European project MOZAIC III (Measurements of ozone, water vapour, carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides aboard Airbus A340 in-service aircraft) employed a Rosemount probe with 80 cm of FEP-tubing connecting the inlet to the gold converter. The NOy concentrations during the flight ranged between 0.3 and 3 ppb. The two data sets were compared in a blind fashion and each team followed its normal operating procedures. On average, the measurements agreed within 7%, i.e. within the combined uncertainty of the two instruments. This puts an upper limit on potential losses of HNO3 in the Rosemount inlet of the MOZAIC instrument. Larger transient deviations were observed during periods after calibrations and when the aircraft entered the stratosphere. The time lag of the MOZAIC instrument observed in these instances is in accordance with the time constant of the MOZAIC inlet line determined in the laboratory for HNO3.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/33349
Identification Number/DOI 10.5194/acp-6-2401-2006
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology
Publisher Copernicus Publications
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar