Earl of Aylesford v Morris (1873)

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

MacMillan, C. (2012) Earl of Aylesford v Morris (1873). In: Mitchell, C. and Mitchell, P. (eds.) Landmark Cases in Equity. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp. 329-355. ISBN 9781849461542

Abstract/Summary

A Characteristic of a landmark case is that it stands for a proposition of law. In Earl of Aylesford v Morris,1 Lord Selborne held that where there existed an inequality between contracting parties, with weakness on one side and an extortionate advantage taken of that weakness on the other, the contract could not stand unless the party claiming the benefit of the contract could rebut the presumption by establishing that the transaction was ‘fair, just and reasonable’. This chapter examines the historical circumstances behind the formulation of this proposition.

Item Type Book or Report Section
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/33264
Refereed Yes
Divisions No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Hart Publishing
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar