Still feeling it: the time course of emotional recovery from an attentional perspective

Lists

Download

Preview

fnhum-07-00201.pdf - Published Version (2MB) | Preview

Tools

Morriss, J., Taylor, A. N. W., Roesch, E. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8913-4173 and Van Reekum, C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1516-1101 (2013) Still feeling it: the time course of emotional recovery from an attentional perspective. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. 201. ISSN 1662-5161 doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00201

Abstract/Summary

Emotional reactivity and the time taken to recover, particularly from negative, stressful, events, are inextricably linked, and both are crucial for maintaining well-being. It is unclear, however, to what extent emotional reactivity during stimulus onset predicts the time course of recovery after stimulus offset. To address this question, 25 participants viewed arousing (negative and positive) and neutral pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS) followed by task-relevant face targets, which were to be gender categorized. Faces were presented early (400–1500 ms) or late (2400–3500 ms) after picture offset to capture the time course of recovery from emotional stimuli. Measures of reaction time (RT), as well as face-locked N170 and P3 components were taken as indicators of the impact of lingering emotion on attentional facilitation or interference. Electrophysiological effects revealed negative and positive images to facilitate face-target processing on the P3 component, regardless of temporal interval. At the individual level, increased reactivity to: (1) negative pictures, quantified as the IAPS picture-locked Late Positive Potential (LPP), predicted larger attentional interference on the face-locked P3 component to faces presented in the late time window after picture offset. (2) Positive pictures, denoted by the LPP, predicted larger facilitation on the face-locked P3 component to faces presented in the earlier time window after picture offset. These results suggest that subsequent processing is still impacted up to 3500 ms after the offset of negative pictures and 1500 ms after the offset of positive pictures for individuals reacting more strongly to these pictures, respectively. Such findings emphasize the importance of individual differences in reactivity when predicting the temporality of emotional recovery. The current experimental model provides a novel basis for future research aiming to identify profiles of adaptive and maladaptive recovery.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type	Article
URI	https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/32879
Item Type	Article
Refereed	Yes
Divisions	Interdisciplinary Research Centres (IDRCs) > Centre for Integrative Neuroscience and Neurodynamics (CINN) Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Neuroscience Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Psychopathology and Affective Neuroscience
Uncontrolled Keywords	emotion, attention, reactivity, recovery, face, late positive potential, P3, N170
Publisher	Frontiers
Download/View statistics	View download statistics for this item

Download Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Deposit Details

Date Deposited:	20 Jun 2013 11:22	Date item deposited into CentAUR
Last Modified:	09 Jun 2024 02:20	Date item last modified

References

Bentin,S.,Allison,T.,Puce,A.,Perez, E.,andMcCarthy,G.(1996). Electrophysiologicalstudiesofface perceptioninhumans. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 8, 551–565. Bocanegra,B.R.,andZeelenberg, R. (2009).Dissociatingemotion- inducedblindnessandhypervision. Emotion 9, 865. Brown,S.B.R.E.,VanSteenbergen,H., Band,G.P.H.,DeRover,M.,and Nieuwenhuis,S.(2012).Functional significanceoftheemotion-related latepositivepotential. Front.Hum. Neurosci. 6:33. doi:10.3389/fnhum. 2012.00033 Ciesielski,B.G.,Armstrong,T.,Zald, D.H.,andOlatunji,B.O.(2010). Emotionmodulationofvisual attention:categoricalandtemporal characteristics. PloS ONE 5:e13860. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013860 Correa,Á.,Lupiáñez,J.,Madrid,E.,and Tudela,P.(2006).Temporalatten- tionenhancesearlyvisualprocess- ing:areviewandnewevidencefrom event-relatedpotentials. BrainRes. 1076, 116–128. Cuthbert,B.,Schupp,H.,Bradley,M., Birbaumer,N.,andLang,P.(1999). Brainpotentialsinaffectivepicture processing:covariationwithauto- nomicarousalandaffectivereport. Biol.Psychol. 52, 95–112. Davidson,R.J.(1998).Affectivestyle and affectivedisorders:perspectives fromaffectiveneuroscience. Cogn. Emot. 12, 307–330. FaceGenModeller.[Software](2012). SingularInversionsInc.Retrieved from:http://www.facegen.com/ Frijda,N.H.(1986). The Emotions. Cambridge:CambridgeUniversity Press. Hajcak,G.,Dunning,J.P.,andFoti, D.(2007).Neuralresponseto emotionalpicturesisunaffected byconcurrenttaskdifficulty:an event-relatedpotentialstudy. Behav. Neurosci. 121, 1156–1162. Hajcak,G.,MacNamara,A.,and Olvet,D.M.(2010).Event-related potentials,emotion,andemo- tionregulation:anintegrative review. Dev.Neuropsychol. 35, 129–155. Hajcak,G.,andOlvet,D.M.(2008). Thepersistenceofattentiontoemo- tion:brainpotentialsduringand afterpicturepresentation. Emotion 8, 250–255. Heller,A.S.,Johnstone,T.,Shackman, A. J.,Light,S.N.,Peterson,M.J., Kolden,G.G.,etal.(2009).Reduced capacitytosustainpositiveemotion in majordepressionreflectsdimin- ishedmaintenanceoffronto-striatal brainactivation. Proc.Natl.Acad. Sci.U.S.A. 106, 22445–22450. Ihssen, N.,Heim,S.,andKeil,A. (2007). Thecostsofemotional attention:affectiveprocessing inhibitssubsequentlexico-semantic analysis. J. Cogn.Neurosci. 19, 1932–1949. Jackson,D.C.,Mueller,C.J.,Dolski, I., Dalton,K.M.,Nitschke,J.B., Urry,H.L.,etal.(2003).Nowyou feel it,nowyoudon’tfrontalbrain electricalasymmetryandindividual differencesinemotionregulation. Psychol.Sci. 14, 612–617. Kappas,A.(2011).Emotionandregu- lationareone! Emot.Rev. 3, 17–25. Lang,P.J.,andBradley,M.M.(2010). Emotionandthemotivational brain. Biol.Psychol. 84, 437–450. Lang,P.J.,Bradley,M.M., and Cuthbert,B.N.(2005). InternationalAffectivePicture System(IAPS):AffectiveRatingsof PicturesandInstructionManual. TechnicalReportA-6.Gainesville, FL: UniversityofFlorida. Larson, C.L.,Nitschke,J.B.,and Davidson,R.J.(2007).Common and distinctpatternsofaffective responseindimensionsofanx- ietyanddepression. Emotion 7, 182–191. Nolen-Hoeksema,S.,Wisco,B.E.,and Lyubomirsky,S.(2008).Rethinking rumination. Perspect.Psychol.Sci. 3, 400–424. Olofsson,J.K.,Nordin,S.,Sequeira, H., andPolich,J.(2008).Affective pictureprocessing:anintegra- tive reviewofERPfindings. Biol. Psychol. 77, 247–265. Roesch,E.B.,Tamarit,L.,Reveret, L., Grandjean,D.,Sander,D.,and Scherer,K.R.(2011).FACSGen: a tooltosynthesizeemotional facialexpressionsthroughsys- tematicmanipulationoffacial actionunits. J. NonverbalBehav. 35, 1–16. Siegle,G.J.,Steinhauer,S.R.,Thase, M.E.,Stenger,V.A.,andCarter,C. S. (2002).Can’tshakethatfeeling: event-relatedfMRIassessment of sustainedamygdalaactivityin responsetoemotionalinformation indepressedindividuals. Biol. Psychiatry 51, 693–707. Schupp,H.,Cuthbert,B.,Bradley, M.,Hillman,C.,Hamm,A.,and Lang,P.(2004).Brainprocesses inemotionalperception:moti- vatedattention. Cogn.Emot. 18, 593–611. Schupp,H.T.,Cuthbert,B.N.,Bradley, M. M.,Cacioppo,J.T.,Ito,T., and Lang,P.J.(2000).Affective pictureprocessing:thelateposi- tive potentialismodulatedbymoti- vationalrelevance. Psychophysiology 37, 257–261. vanReekum,C.M.,Urry,H.L., Johnstone,T.,Thurow,M.E.,Frye, C. J.,Jackson,C.A.,etal.(2007). Individualdifferencesinamygdala and ventromedialprefrontalcor- texactivityareassociatedwith evaluationspeedandpsychological well-being. J. Cogn.Neurosci. 19, 237–248. Weinberg,A.,andHajcak,G.(2010). Beyondgoodandevil:implications of examiningelectrocorticalactivity elicitedbyspecificpicturecontent. Emotion 10, 767–782. Weinberg,A.,andHajcak,G.(2011). Thelatepositivepotentialpredicts subsequentinterferencewithtarget processing. J. Cogn.Neurosci. 23, 2994–3007. Yiend,J.(2010).Theeffectsofemo- tiononattention:areviewof attentionalprocessingofemo- tionalinformation. Cogn.Emot. 24, 3–47.

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar