The myths of modern primitivism

[thumbnail of M Lodder - Myths of Modern Primitivism EJAC_30.2.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Lodder, M. (2011) The myths of modern primitivism. European Journal of American Culture, 30 (2). pp. 99-111. ISSN 1758-9118 doi: 10.1386/ejac.30.2.99_1

Abstract/Summary

RE/Search Publications’ Modern Primitives (Vale and Juno 1989) changed countless lives, bringing what had been a localized and niche set of body modification practices, aesthetics and philosophies out of San Francisco to a global audience, dominating scholarly and popular discourse around body modification subculture for more than a decade afterwards. The voice of Fakir Musafar dominates the book. This article argues that modern primitives as Musafar defines them never really existed (and never could have existed) in the terms he suggests, and goes on to address an important sub-strand within Modern Primitives almost entirely ignored by critics and commentators, who have read the book as generally representative of the body modification culture as a whole. With specific reference to contributors such as infamous tattoo artist Don Ed Hardy who do not frame their practice in ‘primitive’ terms, the article concludes with a study of an alternative account presented by Vale and Juno’s book: body modification as artistic practice.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/31753
Identification Number/DOI 10.1386/ejac.30.2.99_1
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Arts and Communication Design > Art > Art History
Publisher Intellect
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar