Can valuation factors be prescribed? The case of collective enfranchisement and leasehold extension of flats in England and Wales

Dixon, T. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4513-6337, Crosby, N., Marston, A. and Pottinger, G. (2002) Can valuation factors be prescribed? The case of collective enfranchisement and leasehold extension of flats in England and Wales. Journal of Property Research, 19 (3). pp. 253-280. ISSN 1466-4453

Abstract/Summary

Recent concerns over the valuation process in collective leasehold enfranchisement and lease extension cases have culminated in new legislation. To underpin this, the Government (Department of Environment Transport and the Regions (DETR)) commissioned new research, which examined whether the valuation of the freehold in such cases could be simplified through the prescription of either yield or marriage value/relativity. This paper, which is based on that research, examines whether it is possible or desirable to prescribe such factors in the valuation process. Market, settlement and Local Valuation Tribunal (LVT) decisions are analysed, and the basis of 'relativity charts' used in practice is critically examined. Ultimately the imperfect nature of the market in freehold investment sales and leasehold vacant possession sales means that recommendations must rest on an analysis of LVT data. New relativity curves are developed from this data and used in conjunction with an alternative approach to valuation yields (based on other investment assets). However, the paper concludes that although the prescription of yields and relativity is possible, it is not fully defensible because of problems in determining risk premia; that the evidential basis for relativity consists of LVT decisions; and that a formula approach would tend to 'lead' the market as a whole.