Identifying time lags in the restoration of grassland butterfly communities: a multi-site assessment

[thumbnail of Identifying time lags in the restoration of grassland butterfly communities.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Woodcock, B.A., Bullock, J.M., Mortimer, S.R. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6160-6741, Brereton, T., Redhead, J.W., Thomas, J.A. and Pywell, R.F. (2012) Identifying time lags in the restoration of grassland butterfly communities: a multi-site assessment. Biological Conservation, 155. pp. 50-58. ISSN 0006-3207 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.05.013

Abstract/Summary

Although grasslands are crucial habitats for European butterflies, large-scale declines in quality and area have devastated many species. Grassland restoration can contribute to the recovery of butterfly populations, although there is a paucity of information on the long-term effects of management. Using eight UK data sets (9-21 years), we investigate changes in restoration success for (1) arable reversion sites, were grassland was established on bare ground using seed mixtures, and (2) grassland enhancement sites, where degraded grasslands are restored by scrub removal followed by the re-instigation of cutting/grazing. We also assessed the importance of individual butterfly traits and ecological characteristics in determining colonisation times. Consistent increases in restoration success over time were seen for arable reversion sites, with the most rapid rates of increase in restoration success seen over the first 10 years. For grasslands enhancement there were no consistent increases in restoration success over time. Butterfly colonisation times were fastest for species with widespread host plants or where host plants established well during restoration. Low mobility butterfly species took longer to colonise. We show that arable reversion is an effective tool for the management of butterfly communities. We suggest that as restoration takes time to achieve, its use as a mitigation tool against future environmental change (i.e. by decreasing isolation in fragmented landscapes) needs to take into account such time lags.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/30868
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.05.013
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Sustainable Land Management > Centre for Agri-environmental Research (CAER)
Uncontrolled Keywords ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; LIMITING FACTORS; PLANT TRAITS; CONSERVATION; DISPERSAL; MANAGEMENT; LANDSCAPE; INVERTEBRATES; ESTABLISHMENT; CONNECTIVITY
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar