The quality of referendum debate: the UK's electoral system referendum in the print media

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Renwick, A. and Lamb, M. (2013) The quality of referendum debate: the UK's electoral system referendum in the print media. Electoral Studies, 32 (2). pp. 294-304. ISSN 0261-3794 doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2012.10.013

Abstract/Summary

This paper analyses the quality of debate surrounding the UK’s 2011 electoral reform referendum as represented in the print media. It first considers how debate quality in the context of a referendum campaign may best be conceptualized. It then uses content analysis of media coverage to investigate three aspects of that debate: its quantity; the balance between Yes and No arguments, and the quality of reason-giving. It finds that the quantity of debate was comparable to other recent electoral reform referendums. Coverage was predominantly, but not overwhelmingly, hostile to change. The different indicators of the quality of reason-giving present a mixed picture. The paper concludes by considering how the analysis could be extended through further comparison with other cases.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/30547
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.electstud.2012.10.013
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Politics and International Relations
Uncontrolled Keywords referendum; electoral reform; quality of debate; United Kingdom; alternative vote
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar