"The Poet of Science": how scientists read their Tennyson

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Holmes, J. (2012) "The Poet of Science": how scientists read their Tennyson. Victorian Studies, 54 (4). pp. 655-678. ISSN 1527-2052

Abstract/Summary

Tennyson’s responses to science have been thoroughly documented and discussed, but how did scientists respond to his poetry? Through examining in detail the work of three scientists who wrote at length about Tennyson--the astronomer Norman Lockyer, the physicist Oliver Lodge, and the American geologist William North Rice--it is possible to see how Tennyson went from being respected by contemporary scientists to being feted as the Poet of Science itself after his death. As a materialist, a Spiritualist, and a Darwinian Methodist respectively, Lockyer, Lodge, and Rice had very different conceptions of how science worked and what it implied about the universe, yet each looked to Tennyson and his poetry to confirm and extend his own judgements and values.

Additional Information DOI 10.1353/vic.2012.0094 not currently working
Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/28627
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Literature and Languages > English Literature
Additional Information DOI 10.1353/vic.2012.0094 not currently working
Publisher Indiana University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar