Comments, with reply, on "Computational algorithms for pole assignment" by N.K. Nichols

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Petkov, P.H., Christov, N.D., Konstantinov, M.M. and Nichols, N. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1133-5220 (1988) Comments, with reply, on "Computational algorithms for pole assignment" by N.K. Nichols. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 33 (9). pp. 892-894. ISSN 0018-9286 doi: 10.1109/9.1328

Abstract/Summary

Some points of the paper by N.K. Nichols (see ibid., vol.AC-31, p.643-5, 1986), concerning the robust pole assignment of linear multiinput systems, are clarified. It is stressed that the minimization of the condition number of the closed-loop eigenvector matrix does not necessarily lead to robustness of the pole assignment. It is shown why the computational method, which Nichols claims is robust, is in fact numerically unstable with respect to the determination of the gain matrix. In replying, Nichols presents arguments to support the choice of the conditioning of the closed-loop poles as a measure of robustness and to show that the methods of J Kautsky, N. K. Nichols and P. VanDooren (1985) are stable in the sense that they produce accurate solutions to well-conditioned problems.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/27534
Identification Number/DOI 10.1109/9.1328
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology
Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Mathematics and Statistics
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar