Conscientiousness predicts greater recovery from negative emotion

[thumbnail of Javaras_COR_Emotion_inpress.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Javaras, K. N., Schaefer, S. M., Van Reekum, C. M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1516-1101, Lapate, R. C., Greischar, L. L., Bachuber, D. R., Love, G., Ryff, C. D. and Davidson, R. J. (2012) Conscientiousness predicts greater recovery from negative emotion. Emotion, 12 (5). pp. 875-881. ISSN 1931-1516 doi: 10.1037/a0028105

Abstract/Summary

Greater levels of conscientiousness have been associated with lower levels of negative affect. We focus on one mechanism through which conscientiousness may decrease negative affect: effective emotion regulation, as reflected by greater recovery from negative stimuli. In 273 adults who were 35 - 85 years old, we collected self-report measures of personality including conscientiousness and its self-control facet, followed on average 2 years later by psychophysiological measures of emotional reactivity and recovery. Among middle-aged adults (35 - 65 years old), the measures of conscientiousness and self-control predicted greater recovery from, but not reactivity to, negative emotional stimuli. The effect of conscientiousness and self-control on recovery was not driven by other personality variables or by greater task adherence on the part of high conscientiousness individuals. In addition, the effect was specific to negative emotional stimuli and did not hold for neutral or positive emotional stimuli.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/27487
Identification Number/DOI 10.1037/a0028105
Refereed Yes
Divisions Interdisciplinary Research Centres (IDRCs) > Centre for Integrative Neuroscience and Neurodynamics (CINN)
Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
Publisher American Psychological Association
Publisher Statement This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar