Public leisure provision under Compulsory Competitive Tendering: the maintenance of ideological dominance?

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Ravenscroft, N. and Tolley, J. , (1993) Public leisure provision under Compulsory Competitive Tendering: the maintenance of ideological dominance? Working Papers in Land Management & Development. 13/93. Working Paper. University of Reading, Reading. pp26.

Abstract/Summary

Although much has been written about the effect on services of public sector restructuring, little is yet available on public leisure provision. This omission is addressed by considering how the delivery of public leisure services in Britain has been affected by the imposition of Compulsory Competitive Tendering (CCT). In particular, it focuses on the changing relationship between the central and local levels of government recognising, on the part of local government, a continuum of structural responses to central initiatives which have, in some cases, conspired to reduce the impact of CCT on public leisure provision. The paper concludes that although attempts have been made to protect local services, the outcome of the CCT process has been the regeneration of public leisure provision away from its service roots, but within an enduring ideological paradigm of conservative professionalism.

Item Type Report (Working Paper)
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/27259
Divisions Henley Business School > Real Estate and Planning
Publisher University of Reading
Publisher Statement The copyright of each working paper remains with the author. If you wish to quote from or cite any paper please contact the appropriate author; in some cases a more recent version of the paper may have been published elsewhere.
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar