Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

An extreme value theory approach to calculating minimum capital risk requirements

[thumbnail of 24159.pdf]
Preview
24159.pdf - Accepted Version (395kB) | Preview
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Brooks, C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2668-1153, Clare, A.D. and Persand, G. (2002) An extreme value theory approach to calculating minimum capital risk requirements. Journal of Risk Finance, 3 (2). pp. 22-33. ISSN 1526-5943 doi: 10.1108/eb043485

Abstract/Summary

This paper investigates the frequency of extreme events for three LIFFE futures contracts for the calculation of minimum capital risk requirements (MCRRs). We propose a semiparametric approach where the tails are modelled by the Generalized Pareto Distribution and smaller risks are captured by the empirical distribution function. We compare the capital requirements form this approach with those calculated from the unconditional density and from a conditional density - a GARCH(1,1) model. Our primary finding is that both in-sample and for a hold-out sample, our extreme value approach yields superior results than either of the other two models which do not explicitly model the tails of the return distribution. Since the use of these internal models will be permitted under the EC-CAD II, they could be widely adopted in the near future for determining capital adequacies. Hence, close scrutiny of competing models is required to avoid a potentially costly misallocation capital resources while at the same time ensuring the safety of the financial system.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/24159
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Uncontrolled Keywords Minimum Capital Risk Requirements, Generalized Pareto Distribution, GARCH models
Publisher Emerald
Publisher Statement This article is (c) Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here (centaur.reading.ac.uk). Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited. The definitive version can be found at http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1659741
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar