A metaphorical analysis of client organisations and the briefing process

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Green, S. D. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1660-5592 (1996) A metaphorical analysis of client organisations and the briefing process. Construction Management and Economics, 14 (2). pp. 155-164. ISSN 1466-433X doi: 10.1080/014461996373593

Abstract/Summary

This paper reviews and critiques the current practice of classifying building clients according to their 'type'. An alternative approach to understanding organisations is developed in accordance with the principles of naturalistic inquiry. It is contended that the complex pluralistic clients of the 1990s can only really be understood 'from the inside'. The concept of organisational metaphors is introduced as the basis for a more sophisticated way of thinking about organisations. The various strands of organisational theory are also analyzed in terms of their underlying metaphors. Different theories are seen to bring different insights. The implicit metaphors adopted by practitioners are held to be important in that they tend to dictate the adopted approach to client briefing. This contention is illustrated by analyzing three different characterisations of the briefing process in terms of their underlying metaphors. Finally, the discussion is placed in a contemporary UK context by comparing the dominant paradigm of practice during the 1980s to that of the 1990s.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/22944
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/014461996373593
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of the Built Environment > Organisation, People and Technology group
Publisher Routledge
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar