Evaluation of peak-picking algorithms for protein mass spectrometry

[thumbnail of peakpicking_-_latest.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Bauer, C., Cramer, R. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8037-2511 and Schuchhardt, J. (2011) Evaluation of peak-picking algorithms for protein mass spectrometry. In: Hamacher, M., Eisenacher, M. and Stephan, C. (eds.) Data mining in proteomics: from standards to applications. Methods in molecular biology, 696. Humana Press, USA, pp. 341-352. ISBN 9781607619864 doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-987-1_22

Abstract/Summary

Peak picking is an early key step in MS data analysis. We compare three commonly used approaches to peak picking and discuss their merits by means of statistical analysis. Methods investigated encompass signal-to-noise ratio, continuous wavelet transform, and a correlation-based approach using a Gaussian template. Functionality of the three methods is illustrated and discussed in a practical context using a mass spectral data set created with MALDI-TOF technology. Sensitivity and specificity are investigated using a manually defined reference set of peaks. As an additional criterion, the robustness of the three methods is assessed by a perturbation analysis and illustrated using ROC curves.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Book or Report Section
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/18352
Identification Number/DOI 10.1007/978-1-60761-987-1_22
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences
Life Sciences > School of Chemistry, Food and Pharmacy > Department of Chemistry
Publisher Humana Press
Publisher Statement The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar