Coordination and control in project-based work: digital objects and infrastructures for delivery

Downloads

Bechky, B A (2003) Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. American Journal of Sociology, 109(3), 720-52. Blackler, F and Engeström, Y (2005) Special issue on the rise of objects in the study of organizations. Organization, 12(3). Boland, R J, Lyytinen, K and Yoo, Y (2007) Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organization Science, 18(4), 631-47. Bowker, G and Star, S L (1999) Sorting Things Out. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Cacciatori, E (2008) Memory objects in project environments: Storing, retrieving and adapting learning in project-based firms. Research Policy, 37(9), 1591-601. Carlile, P R (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442-55. Carlile, P R (2004) Transferring, translating and transforming: An integrative relational approach to sharing and assessing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555-68. Chrisman, N (1999) Trading Zones or Boundary Objects: Understanding Incomplete Translations of Technical Expertise, 4S - Society for the Social Studies of Science, October 28th-31st, San Diego CA. Clegg, S (1989) Radical revisions: Power, discipline and organizations, Organization Studies, 10(1), 97-115. Collins H, Evans R and Gorman M (2007) Trading zones and interactional expertise, Studies In History and Philosophy of Science, 38(4), 657-66. D’Adderio, L (2003) Configuring software, reconfiguring memories: The influence of integrated systems on the reproduction of knowledge and routines. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(2), 321-50. Dougherty, D (2001) Reimagining the differentiation and integration of work for sustained product innovation. Organization Science, 12(5), 612-31. Eckert, C and Boujut, J-F (2003) The role of objects in design co-operation: Communication through physical or virtual objects. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12(2), 145-51. Edwards, P N, Jackson, S J, Bowker, G C and Knobel, C P (2007) Understanding Infrastructure: Dynamics, tensions, and design. Ann Arbor, MI: DeepBlue. Edwards, P N, Bowker, G C, Jackson, S J and Williams, R (2009) Introduction: An agenda for infrastructure studies. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(5), 364-74. Eisenhardt, K M (1989) Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-50. Eisenhardt, K M and Graebner, M E (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32. Erdogan, B, Anumba, C J, Bouchlaghem, N M and Nielsen, Y (2008) Collaboration environments for construction: Implementation case studies. ASCE Journal of Management in Engineering, 24(4), 234-44. Eriksson-Zetterquist, U, Lindberg, K and Styhre, A (2009) When the good times are over: Professionals encountering new technology. Human Relations, 62(8), 1145-70. Ewenstein, B and Whyte, J (2009) Knowledge practices in design: The role of visual representations as ‘epistemic objects’. Organization Studies, 30(1), 7-30. Fischer, M and Drogemuller, R (2009) Virtual design and construction. In: Newton, P, Hampson, K and Drogemuller, R (Eds.), Technology, Design and Process Innovation in the Built Environment, pp. 293-318. Abingdon, UK: Taylor and Francis. Forgues, D, Koskela, L and Lejeune, A (2009) Information technology as boundary object for transformational learning. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 14, 48-58. Gal, U, Lyytinen, K and Yoo Y (2008) The dynamics of IT boundary objects, information infrastructures, and organisational identities: the introduction of 3D modelling technologies into the architecture, engineering, and construction industry, European Journal of Information Systems, 17(3), 290-304. Galison, P (1996) Computer simulations and the trading zone. In: Galison, P and Stump, D J (Eds.), The Disunity of Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Georg, S and Tryggestad, K (2009) On the emergence of roles in construction: The qualculative role of project management Construction Management and Economics, 27(10), 969-81. Gherardi, S and Nicolini, D (2000) To transfer is to transform: The circulation of safety knowledge. Organization, 7(2), 329-48. Harty, C (2005) Innovation in construction: A sociology of technology approach. Building Research and Information, 33(6), 512-22. Harvey F and Chrisman N (1998) Boundary objects and the social construction of GIS technology, Environment and Planning A, 30(9), 1683-94. Henderson, K (1991) Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Science, Technology and Human Values, 16(4), 448-73. Jarzabkowski, P and Seidl, D (2008) The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy. Organization Studies, 29(11), 1391-426. Knorr Cetina, K (1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Lawrence, P R and Lorsch, J W (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1-30. Leonardi, P M and Bailey, D E (2008) Transformational technologies and the creation of new work practices: Making implicit knowledge explicit in task-based offshoring. MIS Quarterly, 32(2), 411-36. Levina, N and Vaast, E (2005) The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for the implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 29(2), 335-63. Orlikowski, W J (2007) Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435-48. Pettigrew, A M (1985) Contextualist research and the study of organizational change process. In: Mumford, E, Hirschheim, R, Fitzgerald, G and Wood-Harper, A T (Eds.), Research Methods in Information Systems, pp. 53-78. Oxford, UK: New Holland. Pettigrew, A M, Woodman, R W and Cameron, K S (2001) Studying organizational change and development: Challenges for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 697-713. Pipek, V and Wulf, V (2009) Infrastructuring: Toward an integrated perspective on the design and use of information technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(5), 447-73. Rheinberger, H-J (1997) Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing proteins in the test tube. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Sapsed, J and Salter, A J (2004) Postcards from the edge: Local communities, global programs and boundary objects. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1515-34. Shen, G, Brandon, P and Baldwin, A (Eds.) (2009) Collaborative Construction Information Management. London, UK: Spon. Star, S L and Griesemer, J R (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’, and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907 - 1939. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420. Taylor, J E (2007) Antecedents of successful three-dimensional computer-aided design implementation in design and construction networks. Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 133(12), 993-1002. Thomas, R, Hardy, C and Sargent, L (2007) Artifacts in Interaction: The production and politics of boundary objects, Advanced Institute of Management (AIM) Research Paper 052, London, UK: AIM. Trompette P and Vinck D (2009) Revisiting the notion of boundary object, Revue d’Anthropologie des Connaissances, 3(1), 3-25. Van Marrewijk, A, Clegg, S R, Pitsis, T S and Veenswijk, M (2008) Managing public-private megaprojects: Paradoxes, complexity, and project design. International Journal of Project Management, 26(6), 591-600. Whyte, J K, Ewenstein, B, Hales, M and Tidd, J (2007) Visual practices, and the objects of design. Building Research and Information, 35(1), 18-27. Yakura, E K (2002) Charting time: Timelines as temporary boundary objects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 956-70. Yin, R K (1994) Case Study Research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Zeiss, R and Groenewegen, P (2009) Engaging boundary objects in OMS and STS? Exploring the subtleties of layered engagement. Organization, 16(1), 81-100.