Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Visual motion interferes with lexical decision on motion words

Full text not archived in this repository.
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Meteyard, L., Zokaei, N., Bahrami, B. and Vigliocco, G. (2008) Visual motion interferes with lexical decision on motion words. Current Biology, 18 (17). R732-R733. ISSN 0960-9822 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.016

Abstract/Summary

Embodied theories of cognition propose that neural substrates used in experiencing the referent of a word, for example perceiving upward motion, should be engaged in weaker form when that word, for example ‘rise’, is comprehended. Motivated by the finding that the perception of irrelevant background motion at near-threshold, but not supra-threshold, levels interferes with task execution, we assessed whether interference from near-threshold background motion was modulated by its congruence with the meaning of words (semantic content) when participants completed a lexical decision task (deciding if a string of letters is a real word or not). Reaction times for motion words, such as ‘rise’ or ‘fall’, were slower when the direction of visual motion and the ‘motion’ of the word were incongruent — but only when the visual motion was at nearthreshold levels. When motion was supra-threshold, the distribution of error rates, not reaction times, implicated low-level motion processing in the semantic processing of motion words. As the perception of near-threshold signals is not likely to be influenced by strategies, our results support a close contact between semantic information and perceptual systems.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/17120
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Clinical Language Sciences
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar