Rich and famous: recognition-based judgment in the Sunday Times rich list

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

McCloy, R. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2333-9640, Beaman, C.P. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5124-242X and Goddard, K. (2006) Rich and famous: recognition-based judgment in the Sunday Times rich list. In: 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, pp. 1801-1805.

Abstract/Summary

Recognition as a cue to judgment in a novel, multi-option domain (the Sunday Times Rich List) is explored. As in previous studies, participants were found to make use of name recognition as a cue to the presumed wealth of individuals. Names that were recognized were judged to be the richest name from amongst the set presented at above chance levels. This effect persisted across situations in which more than one name was recognized; recognition was used as an inclusion criterion for the sub-set of names to be considered the richest of the set presented. However, when the question was reversed, and a “poorest” judgment was required, use of recognition as an exclusion criterion was observed only when a single name was recognized. Reaction times when making these judgments also show a distinction between “richest” and “poorest” questions with recognition of none of the options taking the longest time to judge in the “richest” question condition and full recognition of all the names presented taking longest to judge in the “poorest” question condition. Implications for decision-making using simple heuristics are discussed.

Item Type Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/14206
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences
Publisher Erlbaum
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar