Target integration and the attentional blink

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Akyurek, E.G. and Hommel, B. (2005) Target integration and the attentional blink. Acta Psychologica, 119 (3). pp. 305-314. ISSN 0001-6918 doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.02.006

Abstract/Summary

If people monitor a visual stimulus stream for targets they often miss the second (T2) if it appears soon after the first (T1)-the attentional blink. There is one exception: T2 is often not missed if it appears right after T1, i.e., at lag 1. This lag-l sparing is commonly attributed to the possibility that T1 processing opens an attentional gate, which may be so sluggish that an early T2 can slip in before it closes. We investigated why the gate may close and exclude further stimuli from processing. We compared a control approach, which assumes that gate closing is exogenously triggered by the appearance of nontargets, and an integration approach, which assumes that gate closing is under endogenous control. As predicted by the latter but not the former, T2 performance and target reversals were strongly affected by the temporal distance between T1 and T2, whereas the presence or the absence of a nontarget intervening between T1 and T2 had little impact. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/14186
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.02.006
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences
Uncontrolled Keywords selective attention, attentional blink, lag-1 sparing , TIME-COURSE, MASKING
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar