Integrative views on dual-task costs

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Band, G.P.H., Jolicoeur, P., Akyurek, E.G. and Memelink, J. (2006) Integrative views on dual-task costs. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18 (4). pp. 481-492. ISSN 0954-1446 doi: 10.1080/09541440500422675

Abstract/Summary

In this paper, we introduce a special issue about unique and shared mechanisms underlying the performance limitations observed in dual tasks. In particular, the relationship between task-switching costs, the attentional-blink effect, and the psychological refractory period effect is reviewed. These costs are traditionally attributed to fixed and unique capacity limitations for task set reconfiguration, target identification, and response selection, respectively However, we argue that more global attentional processes play a role that cuts across these paradigms. This is reason for a more paradigm-independent approach to processing limitations in dual tasks.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/14173
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/09541440500422675
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences
Uncontrolled Keywords PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD, RESTRICTED ATTENTIONAL CAPACITY, RESPONSE SELECTION, COGNITIVE-PROCESSES, SENSORY MODALITIES, EXECUTIVE CONTROL, VISUAL-ATTENTION, WORKING-MEMORY, BLINK, PERFORMANCE
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar