The benefits of providing benefit information in a patient information leaflet

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Bersellini, E. and Berry, D. (2007) The benefits of providing benefit information in a patient information leaflet. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 15 (3). pp. 193-99. ISSN 0961-7671 doi: 10.1211/ijpp.15.3.0006

Abstract/Summary

Objective: To examine the effects of providing two different types of written information about medicine benefits in a patient information leaflet (PIL). Setting: Participants were 358 adult volunteers from the general population recruited from a London railway station and central Reading. Method: The study used a controlled empirical methodology in which people were given a hypothetical, but realistic, scenario about visiting their doctor and being prescribed medication. They then read an information leaflet about the medicine that contained neither, one, or both benefit statements, and finally completed a number of Likert rating scales. Outcome measures included perceived satisfaction and helpfulness of the information, effectiveness and appropriateness of the medicine, benefit and risk to health, and intention to comply. Key findings: Both types of benefit information led to significantly higher ratings on all of the measures taken. Conclusions: Provision of a relatively short ‘benefit’ statement can significantly improve people’s judgements and intention to take a medicine. The findings are important and timely as the European Union is currently considering reviewing their regulations to allow for the inclusion of limited non-promotional benefit information in PILs.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/14138
Identification Number/DOI 10.1211/ijpp.15.3.0006
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar