Orientation coding: a specific deficit in Williams syndrome?

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Farran, E. K. (2006) Orientation coding: a specific deficit in Williams syndrome? Developmental Neuropsychology, 29 (3). pp. 397-414. ISSN 8756-5641 doi: 10.1207/s15326942dn2903_1

Abstract/Summary

Williams syndrome (WS) is a rare genetic disorder with a unique cognitive profile in which verbal abilities are markedly stronger than visuospatial abilities. This study investigated the claim that orientation coding is a specific deficit within the visuospatial domain in WS. Experiment I employed a simplified version of the Benton Judgement of Line Orientation task and a control, length-matching task. Results demonstrated comparable levels of orientation matching performance in the group with WS and a group of typically developing (TD) controls matched by nonverbal ability, although it is possible that floor effects masked group differences. A group difference was observed in the length-matching task due to stronger performance from the control group. Experiment 2 employed an orientation-discrimination task and a length-discrimination task. Contrary to previous reports, the results showed that individuals with WS were able to code by orientation to a comparable level as that of their matched controls. This demonstrates that, although some impairment is apparent, orientation coding does not represent a specific deficit in WS. Comparison between Experiments I and 2 suggests that orientation coding is vulnerable to task complexity. However, once again, this vulnerability does not appear to be specific to the population with WS, as it was also apparent in the TD controls.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/14075
Identification Number/DOI 10.1207/s15326942dn2903_1
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences
Uncontrolled Keywords DISCRIMINATION, CONSTRUCTION, PERCEPTION, PHENOTYPE, CHILDREN
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar