Spatial offset of test field elements from surround elements affects the strength of motion aftereffects

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Harris, J., Sullivan, D. and Oakley, M. (2008) Spatial offset of test field elements from surround elements affects the strength of motion aftereffects. Perception, 37 (7). pp. 1010-1021. ISSN 0301-0066 doi: 10.1068/p6001

Abstract/Summary

Static movement aftereffects (MAEs) were measured after adaptation to vertical square-wave luminance gratings drifting horizontally within a central window in a surrounding stationary vertical grating. The relationship between the stationary test grating and the surround was manipulated by varying the alignment of the stationary stripes in the window and those in the surround, and the type of outline separating the window and the surround [no outline, black outline (invisible on black stripes), and red outline (visible throughout its length)]. Offsetting the stripes in the window significantly increased both the duration and ratings of the strength of MAEs. Manipulating the outline had no significant effect on either measure of MAE strength. In a second experiment, in which the stationary test fields alone were presented, participants judged how segregated the test field appeared from its surround. In contrast to the MAE measures, outline as well as offset contributed to judged segregation. In a third experiment, in which test-stripe offset wits systematically manipulated, segregation ratings rose with offset. However, MAE strength was greater at medium than at either small or large (180 degrees phase shift) offsets. The effects of these manipulations on the MAE are interpreted in terms of a spatial mechanism which integrates motion signals along collinear contours of the test field and surround, and so causes a reduction of motion contrast at the edges of the test field.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/14028
Identification Number/DOI 10.1068/p6001
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences
Uncontrolled Keywords VISUAL-MOTION, PERCEIVED POSITION, SIGNALS, ORIENTATION, INTEGRATION, ADAPTATION, PERCEPTION, CONTEXT, ABSENCE, RANGE
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar